home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 06:44:02 -0400
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 17:21:16 +1000 (EST)
- Subject: Pure C binding problem?
- Subject: RE: MiNTLIBS
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 06:44:02 -0400
- From: "Nicholas S Castellano" <entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
- To: mint@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
- Subject: Pure C binding problem?
-
-
- Could someone who uses Pure C confirm this?
-
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 17:21:16 +1000 (EST)
- >From: Andrew Vesperman <avesperm@enterprise.powerup.com.au>
- Subject: RE: MiNTLIBS
- To: entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
- Mime-Version: 1.0
-
-
-
- Probably reported, probably fixed.
-
- Bug in PureC part of MiNTLIBS PL 35.
- (I haven't seen any other PL's of these libraries,
- and I don't have all of this one, just bits)
-
-
- ----------------------
- In Hohmuth's re-entrant Pure-C MiNT Bindings, the
- binding for Fselect is munged...It should look like
- this:
-
- .MODULE Fselect
- SYS_WLLL GEMDOS,#$11d,d0,a0,a1,d1
- rts
- .ENDMOD
- ----------------------
-
- --
- entropy -- it's not just a good idea, it's the second law.
- Personal mail: entropy@gnu.ai.mit.edu
- MiNT library mail: entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
- "what do you have against octal?" -jrb
-
-